General form of registration statement for all companies including face-amount certificate companies

Fair Value Measurement

v3.21.2
Fair Value Measurement
9 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2021
Dec. 31, 2020
Fair Value Measurement    
Fair Value Measurement

7.     Fair Value Measurement

The following tables present the Company’s financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

As of September 30, 2021

Quoted Market

Prices in Active

Significant

Markets for

Significant Other

Unobservable

Identical Assets

Observable Inputs

Inputs

Total Fair Value

(in thousands)

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Measurements

Assets:

    

  

    

  

    

  

    

  

Cash equivalents

$

11,725

11,725

Liabilities:

Contingent consideration current

 

1,717

 

1,717

Contingent consideration non-current

 

 

Total contingent consideration

$

$

$

1,717

$

1,717

As of December 31, 2020

Quoted Market

 

Prices in Active

Significant

Markets for

Significant Other

Unobservable

 

Identical Assets

 

Observable Inputs

Inputs

Tota1 Fair Value

(in thousands)

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

Measurements

Assets:

    

 

  

    

 

  

    

 

  

    

 

  

Cash equivalents

 

$

2,474

 

$

 

$

 

$

2,474

Liabilities:

Contingent consideration current

1,198

1,198

Contingent consideration non-current

 

462

 

462

Total contingent consideration

$

 

$

 

$

1,660

 

$

1,660

Cash equivalents consisting of money market funds of $11.7 million and money market funds and time deposits of $2.5 million as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, were classified as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy and valued using quoted market prices in active markets.

Contingent consideration relates to potential payments that the Company may be required to make associated with a business combination. To the extent that the valuations of these liabilities are based on inputs that are less observable or not observable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised in determining fair value is greatest for measures categorized in Level 3.

Rollforward of the fair value measurements of the contingent consideration categorized with Level 3 inputs as of September 30, 2021 is as follows:

(in thousands)

Balance at January 1, 2021

$

1,660

Fair value adjustments

 

57

Payments during the year

 

Balance at September 30, 2021

$

1,717

The fair value of the component of contingent consideration related to achievement of revenue targets have been estimated using a Monte Carlo model to simulate future performance of the acquired business under a risk-neutral framework; significant assumptions include a risk-adjusted discount rate of 13.5% and revenue volatility of 29.0%. The fair value of the component of contingent consideration related to achievement of four technical milestones have been estimated using situation-based modeling, which considers the probability-weighted present value of the expected payout amount.

7. Fair Value Measurement

The following tables present the Company’s financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

As of December 31, 2020

Quoted Market

Prices in Active

Significant

Markets for

Significant Other

Unobservable

Identical Assets

Observable Inputs

 Inputs

Total Fair Value 

(in thousands)

    

(Level 1)

    

(Level 2)

    

(Level 3)

    

Measurements

Assets:

  

  

  

  

Cash equivalents:

$

2,474

$

$

$

2,474

Liabilities:

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Contingent consideration current

 

 

 

1,198

 

1,198

Contingent consideration non‑current

 

 

 

462

 

462

Contingent consideration

$

$

$

1,660

$

1,660

As of December 31, 2019

Quoted Market

Prices in Active

Significant 

Markets for

Significant Other

Unobservable

Identical Assets

Observable Inputs

 Inputs

Total Fair Value 

(in thousands)

    

(Level 1)

    

(Level 2)

    

(Level 3)

    

Measurements

Assets:

  

  

  

  

Cash equivalents:

$

2,473

$

$

$

2,473

Liabilities:

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Contingent consideration current

 

 

 

2,014

 

2,014

Contingent consideration non‑current

 

 

 

1,196

 

1,196

Contingent consideration

$

$

$

3,210

$

3,210

Cash equivalents, consisting of money market funds and time deposits, of $2.5 million and $2.5 million as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, were classified as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy and valued using quoted market prices in active markets.

Contingent consideration relates to potential payments that the Company may be required to make associated with a business combination. To the extent that the valuations of these liabilities are based on inputs that are less observable or not observable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised in determining fair value is greatest for measures categorized in Level 3.

Rollforward of the fair value measurements of the contingent consideration categorized with Level 3 inputs for the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 is as follows:

Balance at January 1, 2019

    

$

Fair value at date of acquisition

4,689

Fair value adjustments

 

(1,079)

Payments during the year

 

(601)

Accretion expense

 

201

Balance at December 31, 2019

$

3,210

Fair value adjustments

 

(949)

Payments during the year

 

(601)

Balance at December 31, 2020

$

1,660

The fair value of the component of contingent consideration related to achievement of revenue targets have been estimated using a Monte Carlo model to simulate future performance of the acquired business under a risk-neutral framework; significant assumptions include a risk-adjusted discount rate of 12.7% and revenue volatility of 30.0% for December 31, 2020 and a risk-adjusted discount rate of 14.8% and revenue volatility of 23.0% for December 31, 2019. The fair value of the component of contingent consideration related to achievement of four technical milestones have been estimated using situation-based modeling, which considers the probability-weighted present value of the expected payout amount.